This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty u/s 271G untenable as no transfer pricing adjustment possible due to omission of section 92BA(i): ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Aura Spinwell Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs Aura Spinwell Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Penalty u/s 271G untenable as no transfer pricing adjustment possible due to omission of section 92BA(i): ITAT Mumbai
ITAT Mumbai held that no transfer pricing adjustment could have been made in the hands of assessee on account of ALP of specified domestic transactions as section 92BA(i) of Income Tax Act was omitted. Thus, since provisions of section 92D are not applicable, penalty u/s. 271G of the Income Tax Act untenable.
Facts-
Assessee is a company engaged in the business of trading in grey fabric, recycled polyester yarn and other allied product...
Author Info
