This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustained as concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars not proved
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Goldstar Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2002-03
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Goldstar Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as entire addition is made on estimation basis and at no point of time it is proved that assessee has concealed the particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income.
Facts- On the basis of completed assessment framed under section 143(3) read with 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) determining the total income at Rs.4,63,769/- by making addition of the commission income @ 0.15% in case of assessee...






