Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustained as concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars not proved

Case Law Details

Case Name
Goldstar Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Vs  Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2002-03
Advertisement
Goldstar Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Vs  Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as entire addition is made on estimation basis and at no point of time it is proved that assessee has concealed the particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income. Facts- On the basis of completed assessment framed under section 143(3) read with 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) determining the total income at Rs.4,63,769/- by making addition of the commission income @ 0.15% in case of assessee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *