Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Mohd. Umar Timber Mart. (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Mohd Umar Timber Mart (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that it is settled legal position that when income is estimated, then there can be no question of imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Facts- The assessee in dealer in timber and wooden items. For the A.Y. 2009-10, Assessee has filed the return of income on 18.09.2010, for the A.Y. 2010-11 the same was duly processed u/s 143(1). Subsequently, based on certain information received from sales tax department, Maharashtra, giving names and details of certain dealers, who were providing entries for bogus purchase bills, assessee’s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930