Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramchandra Udaysingh Jadhavrao Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ramchandra Udaysingh Jadhavrao Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)

ITAT Pune Rules Against Penalty for Declared Income Post-Survey

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune, in the case of Ramchandra Udaysingh Jadhavrao vs. ACIT, ruled that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be imposed if income uncovered during a survey under Section 133A is voluntarily declared in the tax return. The case pertained to the assessment year 2016-17, where the appellant, a proprietor of M/s. JKG Developers, was subj

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Dynamic and detail-oriented Chartered Accountancy professional with expertise in Direct Taxation, Income Tax Litigation, and Tax Compliance. I bring over three years of comprehensive experience through my articleship at Kirtane & Pandit LLP, Pune, where I excelled in: ➡️Managing scrutiny View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Addition of bogus LTCG u/s 68 deleted to prevent double taxation: ITAT Pune Section 115BBE not applicable to business income declared during survey: ITAT Pune Income Tax Rule 128 for claiming foreign tax credit is directory in nature: ITAT Pune ITAT Mumbai Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Against Shah Rukh Khan Reassessment not valid if no application of mind by AO: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31