Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Iyergopal Ashokkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Iyergopal Ashokkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

In this case, the penalty was levied under section 271 B of the Act on the ground that tax audit report under section 44AB of the Act was not filed by the assessee before filing of return of income and no explanation was given. The Assessing Officer has further stated that quantum addition settled under VSVS is different from levy of penalty under section 271 B of the Act. We find that the Assessing Officer has correctly decided the issue. Under these facts and circumstances of the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31