Case Law Details
Case Name : Iyergopal Ashokkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Iyergopal Ashokkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
In this case, the penalty was levied under section 271 B of the Act on the ground that tax audit report under section 44AB of the Act was not filed by the assessee before filing of return of income and no explanation was given. The Assessing Officer has further stated that quantum addition settled under VSVS is different from levy of penalty under section 271 B of the Act. We find that the Assessing Officer has correctly decided the issue. Under these facts and circumstances of the
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.