Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Iyergopal Ashokkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Iyergopal Ashokkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) In this case, the penalty was levied under section 271 B of the Act on the ground that tax audit report under section 44AB of the Act was not filed by the assessee before filing of return of income and no explanation was given. The Assessing Officer has further stated that quantum addition settled under VSVS is different from levy of penalty under section 271 B of the Act. We find that the Assessing Officer has correctly decided the issue. Under these facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have been adjudicated the penalty levied...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930