Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P.S. Jayaraman Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

P.S. Jayaraman Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)

Ld. CIT(A) concurred with assessee’s submissions that deduction u/s 54F was solely due to difference in interpretations of the provisions and therefore, the penalty was not to be levied on this count. However, the provisions of Sec. 54EC were clear that the investment in a financial year was not to exceed Rs.50 Lacs and therefore, it could not be said that the assessee’s interpretation of provisions of Sec. 54EC was bona-fide. Therefore, the penalty against this addition as well as o

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31