Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. (ITAT Cochin)

Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271B was justified as assessee had not produced audit report in the prescribed format before AO and no explanation regarding the reasonable cause for not filing the audit report within the prescribed time limit was given.

Held: In the present case, AO levied penalty under section 271B  on non filing of audit report within the stipulated time limit i.e. on

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31