Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Cochin
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
ITO Vs M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. (ITAT Cochin)
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271B was justified as assessee had not produced audit report in the prescribed format before AO and no explanation regarding the reasonable cause for not filing the audit report within the prescribed time limit was given.
Held: In the present case, AO levied penalty under section 271B on non filing of audit report within the stipulated time limit i.e. on
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.