Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. (ITAT Cochin)

Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271B was justified as assessee had not produced audit report in the prescribed format before AO and no explanation regarding the reasonable cause for not filing the audit report within the prescribed time limit was given.

Held: In the present case, AO levied penalty under section 271B  on non filing of audit report within the stipulated time limit i.e. on

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930