Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs M/s. Peroorkada Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. (ITAT Cochin) Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271B was justified as assessee had not produced audit report in the prescribed format before AO and no explanation regarding the reasonable cause for not filing the audit report within the prescribed time limit was given. Held: In the present case, AO levied penalty under section 271B  on non filing of audit report within the stipulated time limit i.e. on 30/09/2014. Assessee claimed that it was a co-operative society and the audit of the Society was done as per the provisions of Kerala Co-ope...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930