Penalty Imposed Solely on Estimated Profit Addition is not justified

Bhawarlal Tarachandji Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Introduction: The case of “Bhawarlal Tarachandji Jain vs ITO” involves the determination of income and the subsequent imposition of a penalty by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai. The penalty was levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for alleged concealment of income based on estimated additions. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, including the legal arguments presented and the conclusion reach

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.