Case Law Details
Bhawarlal Tarachandji Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Introduction: The case of “Bhawarlal Tarachandji Jain vs ITO” involves the determination of income and the subsequent imposition of a penalty by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai. The penalty was levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for alleged concealment of income based on estimated additions. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, including the legal arguments presented and the conclusion reached by ITAT Mumbai.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background of the Case: The assessee filed appeals against different orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. These appeals revolved around the common issue of the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealing income. ITAT Mumbai decided to adjudicate both appeals together, with one appeal serving as the lead case.
2. Grounds of Appeal: The grounds of appeal presented by the assessee included challenges to the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) and the disallowance of certain purchases treated as made from hawala dealers. The key arguments raised by the assessee were as follows:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
