Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Moola Padmaja Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Moola Padmaja Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of Income tax Act cannot be cancelled merely because of non-specification of limb i.e., for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particular of income under which penalty is levied. Facts- The assessee is an individual and co-owner of a parcel of land admeasuring acres 6.08 guntas. The assessee along with other co-owners entered into a land development agreement with M/s. Western Constructions on 03.05.2007. As per the supplementary development agreement dated 26.03.2010 the landlords were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031