Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Moola Padmaja Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Moola Padmaja Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of Income tax Act cannot be cancelled merely because of non-specification of limb i.e., for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particular of income under which penalty is levied.

Facts- The assessee is an individual and co-owner of a parcel of land admeasuring acres 6.08 guntas. The assessee along with other co-owners entered into a land development agreement with M/

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31