Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Non-Speaking Order Set Aside – ITAT Sends ₹7.26 Cr Capital-Gain Dispute Back to CIT(A)

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kaushal Kumar Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-2019
Advertisement
Kaushal Kumar Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee did not file ROI originally. Based on information regarding sale of immovable property and cash deposits, AO issued notice u/s 148. Assessee then filed return declaring income of ₹10,43,400. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, making a massive addition u/s 45 by taking the entire gross sale consideration of ₹7,26,82,500 as taxable capital gains, resulting in assessed income of ₹7,37,25,900. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee did not attend hearings fixed on 05/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 05/05/2025 & 27/05/2025. CIT(A), therefore, passed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *