Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kaushal Kumar Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kaushal Kumar Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee did not file ROI originally. Based on information regarding sale of immovable property and cash deposits, AO issued notice u/s 148. Assessee then filed return declaring income of ₹10,43,400. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, making a massive addition u/s 45 by taking the entire gross sale consideration of ₹7,26,82,500 as taxable capital gains, resulting in assessed income of ₹7,37,25,900. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee did not attend hearings fixed on 05/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 05/05/2025 & 27/05/2025. CIT(A), therefore, passed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930