Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nandkumar Baban Saste Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Nandkumar Baban Saste Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

IDS Declaration Alone Cannot Justify Addition—ITAT Sends Case Back for Proper Hearing – CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order Quashed; JDA & IDS Issues to Be Re-Examined

Assessee, an individual farmer, did not file ROI for AY 2017-18. AO reopened assessment u/s 147 on the basis that assessee had made a declaration of ₹88,22,870 under IDS-2016 for AY 2014-15 but had not paid IDS taxes. In response to notice u/s 148, assessee filed a return declaring income of only ₹138.

During assessment, assessee explai

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031