Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Non-Speaking CIT(A) Order Quashed; IDS & JDA Issues Re-Examined

Case Law Details

Case Name
Nandkumar Baban Saste Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-2018
Advertisement
Nandkumar Baban Saste Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) IDS Declaration Alone Cannot Justify Addition—ITAT Sends Case Back for Proper Hearing – CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order Quashed; JDA & IDS Issues to Be Re-Examined Assessee, an individual farmer, did not file ROI for AY 2017-18. AO reopened assessment u/s 147 on the basis that assessee had made a declaration of ₹88,22,870 under IDS-2016 for AY 2014-15 but had not paid IDS taxes. In response to notice u/s 148, assessee filed a return declaring income of only ₹138. During assessment, assessee explained that the IDS declaration related to a J...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *