Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Flagship Indian Investment Company (Mauritius) Limited Vs Asst. DIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4075/Mum/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/03/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Court: Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Citation: Flagship Indian Investment Company (Mauritius) Limited (2010-TII-93-ITAT-MUM-INTL)

Brief: Ruling  allows the non-resident assessees to toggle between the DTAA and the Act. The logic of the decision is also in consonance with the provisions of the section 90(2) of the Act which allows the non-residents to be governed by the provisions of the DTAA or Act, whichever is beneficial to them.

Facts: Flagship Indian Investment Company (Mauritius) Limited (‘assessee’) was incorporated and a tax resident of Mauritius. The assessee was registered with the Securities Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) as a sub-account of JP Morgan Fleming Asset Management, which was registered with the SEBI as a Foreign Institutional Investor. The return was filed declaring total income at `Nil for the Assessment Year 2005-06 after claiming capital gains tax exemption in terms of Article 13 of Double Tax Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius (‘DTAA’).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031