Case Law Details
Case Name : Sudarshan Nirman Co Vs ITO Ward 3(5) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Sudarshan Nirman Co Vs ITO Ward 3(5) (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that non-receipt of confirmation from the sundry creditors under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act cannot result into addition since parties are identified, transaction of purchase of land is accepted and reason for outstanding amount is explained.
Facts- The assessee is a partnership firm carrying on the business of builders and developers, filed its return of income at a total income of Rs.3,10,736/-.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.