Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. DIT (Intelligence and Criminal Investigation)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 36 to 43/Nag/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09 to 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. DIT (Intelligence and Criminal Investigation)

The Hon’ble Nagpur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur, allowed the appeal filed by the applicant Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. DIT (I&CI), Nagpur. In this case common issue raised by the applicant for the A.Ys. 2008-09 to 2015-16.

Brief of the Case :- The assesee is a cooperative bank. As per the provisions of section 285BA of the Act, an obligation has been cast upon the assessee to furnish the AIR in the requisite Form in respect of the specified transactions. The assessee did not submit this Form for any of the years under consideration. An inspection was carried out, in which it was observed that the assessee was not filing the AIRs. On being called upon to explain the reasons for non-compliance, the assessee submitted that it was not aware of the obligation to file the AIR and it was only pursuant to the inspection that this obligation came to its notice and was immediately complied with for all the years under consideration. In the opinion of the AO, the assessee ought to have the knowledge about its obligation to file the AIR. Rejecting the assessee’s contention, he imposed penalty u/s 271FA for all the 8 years amounting to (around) Rs.14 lakhs. The Ld.CIT(A) echoed the penalty orders passed by the AO. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee approached the Hon’ble Tribunal.

Facts examined by the Tribunal :- It is seen that section 285BA was inserted by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 01.04.2004. Admittedly, the assesssee was under obligation to file the AIR in respect of the specified transactions. The assessee did not file AIRs ab initio. It was only pursuant to the inspection that it came to know of its obligation to file the AIRs, which obligation was discharged for all the years immediately on coming to know of it. Section 271FA imposes penalty in case of default under section 285BA. However, section 271FA is included u/s 273B, which provides that the penalty should not be imposed under the concerned sections where there exists a reasonable cause for the failure. Thus, section 271FA is subjection to section 273B. The result is that if there exists a reasonable cause for not complying with the provisions of section 285BA, for whcih the penalty is otherwise imposable u/s 271FA, such penalty will not be levied.

Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal satisfied that there was a reasonable cause for the assesse in not filing the AIRs in terms of section 285BA of the Act. Resultantly, the penalty so imposed u/s 271FA is directed to be deleted.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031