Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs Piramal Glass Limited (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 556 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/06/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pr. CIT Vs Piramal Glass Limited (Bombay High Court)

Section 32(1)(ii) Rights acquired by the assessee under the said agreement not only give enduring benefit, protected the assessee’s business against competence, that too from a person who had closely worked with the assessee in the same business. The expression ‘or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature’ used in Explanation 3 to sub-section 32(1)(ii) is wide enough to include the present situation and make Assess eligible to claim depreciation on Non-compete rights.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT

1. This Appeal filed by the Revenue to challenge the Judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’ for short). Following questions of law are presented for our consideration :

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031