Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs. Balbir Singh Maini (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT Vs. Balbir Singh Maini (Supreme Court of India)

Capital gain arising under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) which never materialized for want of necessary permissions was nothing but a hypothetical income and the same could not, therefore, be taxed under section 45 read with section 48.

 In the facts of the present case, it is clear that the income from capital gain on a transaction which never materialized is, at best, a hypothetical income. It is admitted that, for want of permissions,

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31