Case Law Details
Case Name : Kumar Urban Development Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kumar Urban Development Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO u/s 14A read with rule 8D is justified in law?
In the present case, the assessee made suo moto disallowance u/s.14A in terms of Rule 8D. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee did not offer proper disallowance. He made his own calculation of assessment the order and worked out the amount disallowable. The differential amount was disallowed. The assessee submitted before the ld. CIT(A) that the difference in assessee’s calculation and that of AO arose primarily becaus...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

