Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Strides Arcolab Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2000- 01
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Merely because assessee has made some legal claim which has not been accepted by A.O. that will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income  ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH `E’ MUMBAI, Strides Arcolab Ltd. Vs. ACIT, APPEAL NO: ITA NO. 6233/Mum/2009, DECIDED ON June 30, 2010 ORDER PER R S PADVEKAR: In this appeal, the assessee has challenged the impugned order of the ld CIT(A) for assessment year –22, Mumbai dated 6.11.2009 in which the penalty levied by the A.O. u/s 271(1)(c ) for the A.Y. 2000-01 has been confirmed. 2 The assessee has taken the following effectiv...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930