Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Arif Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Arif Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) In this case the main contention of the learned A.R. is that the Assessing Officer (AO) is precluded from making addition under Section 68 of the Act with respect of the unexplained bank deposits. Unexplained bank deposits cannot be considered under Section 68 of the Act and it falls under Section 69A of the Act. However, mentioning a wrong section by the AO is not fatal. ITAT held that it has to see the substance and not the form and Accordingly, reject this ground of appeal of the assessee. Addition towards inflated sales during demonetisation  Now coming ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930