Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Arif Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Arif Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)

In this case the main contention of the learned A.R. is that the Assessing Officer (AO) is precluded from making addition under Section 68 of the Act with respect of the unexplained bank deposits. Unexplained bank deposits cannot be considered under Section 68 of the Act and it falls under Section 69A of the Act. However, mentioning a wrong section by the AO is not fatal. ITAT held that it has to see the substance and not the form and Accordingly, reject this ground of appeal of the assessee.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31