This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere admission of Appeal by High Court sufficient to cancel penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Nayan Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 1997- 98
- Courts
- ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Nayan Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
When the High Court admits substantial question of law on an addition, it becomes apparent that the addition is certainly debatable. In such circumstances penalty cannot be levied u!s 271(1)(c) as has been held in several cases including Rupam Mercantile Vs. DCIT [(2004) 91 ITD 237 (Ahd) (TM)] and Smt.Ramila Ratilal Shah Vs. ACIT [(1998) 60 TTJ (Ahd) 171].
_____________________________________
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI
Before Shri R.S.Syal, AM and Smt.Asha Vijayaraghavan, JM
ITA No. 2379...
