Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Ramdas Moze Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Ramdas Moze Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee had not filed return for AY 2015-16. Case was flagged as P1 risk on Insight Portal due to large property transaction. AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 23.03.2022; no reply was filed. AO thereafter issued notice u/s 148 & initiated reassessment. In response to 142(1), Assessee submitted Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 showing transfer of land to R.G. Developers on 50% sharing basis with possession handed over & refundable security deposit of Rs.40 lakh received. AO invoked s.2(47)(v) r.w.s.53A, held that transfer occurred in AY 2015-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930