Case Law Details
Case Name : Dy. CIT Vs. M/s. Gayatri Construction Co. (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2003- 04
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
The impugned amount was not in the nature of penalty on account of disobedience or infraction of any law. In fact, the assessee being in the business of execution of Civil Construction work, therefore under an obligation to complete the contract within a specified time and in case of delay, he is subject to liquidated damages. The impugned amount was nothing but in the nature of liquidated damages, therefore allowable as business expenditure. We hold accordingly. The view taken by the ld.CIT(A) is hereby confirme
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.