Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Wexco Homes Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WA No. 238 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/02/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Wexco Homes Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court)

Introduction: In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has provided relief to taxpayers facing coercive tax recovery actions by directing the Income Tax Department to keep recovery proceedings in abeyance until the disposal of stay petitions or income tax appeals. This judgment came in response to a writ appeal filed by Wexco Homes Private Ltd. against an earlier judgment that did not grant a stay of recovery proceedings while their appeal was pending before the appellate authority.

Detailed Analysis: Wexco Homes Private Ltd., aggrieved by an order demanding tax recovery, had initially approached the Kerala High Court seeking relief against coercive recovery steps initiated by the Income Tax Department. The company had already filed an appeal (Ext.P2) along with a stay petition (Ext.P3) against the recovery order (Ext.P1) before the appellate authority. Despite this, recovery actions were being pursued, prompting the company to seek judicial intervention.

The learned Single Judge’s decision to dismiss the writ petition without staying the recovery proceedings led Wexco Homes Private Ltd. to file a writ appeal. Upon review, the Division Bench recognized the necessity to safeguard the appellant’s interests pending the resolution of the statutory appeal process. It was reasoned that if an appellant is subjected to coercive recovery while their appeal and stay petition are under consideration, it would undermine the very purpose of filing an appeal.

Therefore, the Court modified the earlier judgment to specifically direct that recovery proceedings against Wexco Homes Private Ltd. for the amounts demanded by the impugned order should be held in abeyance until the appellate authority decides on the stay petitions or appeals, whichever comes first. This modification aims to ensure that taxpayers are not unduly penalized with recovery actions while their appeals, which may have merit, are still being evaluated.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031