Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanchanben Maheshbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kanchanben Maheshbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

ITAT Pune order on determination of road vs aerial distance for agricultural land municipal limits & CBDT Circulars have binding authority in cases of interpretation conflicts

The key issue in this case was whether the land sold by the assessee qualified as a “capital asset” under Section 2(14)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. If the land was within 8 kilometers of the municipal limits, it would be taxable under capital gains.

1. Facts of the Case:

The assessee, along with four co-owne

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. Anand Prakash Agrawal says:

    Dear Manocha,
    The dispute in the case is not between correctness of google map v. authorities’ measurement but between road distance and aerial distance. There is no comment on the veracity of the google map which was not under challenge. Hence your inference about the google map is neither borne out of the order nor a correct inference. Expecting more caution while drawing inferences and conclusions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31