Case Law Details
Case Name : Sandeep Auraneebadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Sandeep Auraneebadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Sandeep Auraneebadkar appealed against the order of the CIT(A) regarding the addition of Rs. 8,73,824 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act for unexplained credit card payments. The assessee claimed that the credit card payments were from his income, past savings, and reimbursement for family expenses. However, the Assessing Officer made the addition due to disbelief in the explanations without sufficient evidence. The ITAT Hyderabad partially allowed the appeal, deleting Rs. 4
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.