Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandeep Auraneebadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandeep Auraneebadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Sandeep Auraneebadkar appealed against the order of the CIT(A) regarding the addition of Rs. 8,73,824 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act for unexplained credit card payments. The assessee claimed that the credit card payments were from his income, past savings, and reimbursement for family expenses. However, the Assessing Officer made the addition due to disbelief in the explanations without sufficient evidence. The ITAT Hyderabad partially allowed the appeal, deleting Rs. 4,73,824 of the total addition and confirming Rs. 4,00,000. The decisio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930