Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandeep Auraneebadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sandeep Auraneebadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Sandeep Auraneebadkar appealed against the order of the CIT(A) regarding the addition of Rs. 8,73,824 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act for unexplained credit card payments. The assessee claimed that the credit card payments were from his income, past savings, and reimbursement for family expenses. However, the Assessing Officer made the addition due to disbelief in the explanations without sufficient evidence. The ITAT Hyderabad partially allowed the appeal, deleting Rs. 4

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31