Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

The Tribunal observed that although the assessee did not furnish a return u/s 139(1) for AY 2017-18, she had voluntarily remitted ₹16,00,000 as self-assessment tax well in advance of the notice issued u/s 148. Upon receipt of the notice, she promptly filed the return disclosing long-term capital gains of ₹1,50,68,940, which the Assessing Officer accepted in toto without any variation. The delay in filing the return was attributed to genuine uncertainty surrounding the taxability of gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Quashed as Original Reason for 147 Fails – No Other Additions Can Survive Reassessment Quashed: Penny-Stock Gains Fully Disclosed, No Evidence of Bogus Deals Reassessment Quashed for Being Time-Barred: ITAT Holds 148 Notice Beyond Six-Year Limit Reassessment Found Erroneous for Not Applying Checkmate Law—Revision Justified Section 148 Reassessment Cannot Be Initiated Against Deceased ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031