Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) The Tribunal observed that although the assessee did not furnish a return u/s 139(1) for AY 2017-18, she had voluntarily remitted ₹16,00,000 as self-assessment tax well in advance of the notice issued u/s 148. Upon receipt of the notice, she promptly filed the return disclosing long-term capital gains of ₹1,50,68,940, which the Assessing Officer accepted in toto without any variation. The delay in filing the return was attributed to genuine uncertainty surrounding the taxability of gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement involving sh...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031