Case Law Details
Case Name : Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
The Tribunal observed that although the assessee did not furnish a return u/s 139(1) for AY 2017-18, she had voluntarily remitted ₹16,00,000 as self-assessment tax well in advance of the notice issued u/s 148. Upon receipt of the notice, she promptly filed the return disclosing long-term capital gains of ₹1,50,68,940, which the Assessing Officer accepted in toto without any variation. The delay in filing the return was attributed to genuine uncertainty surrounding the taxability of gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


