Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haribabu Yenuganti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Haribabu Yenuganti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Hyderabad ITAT Restores Appeal to CIT(A) — Opportunity Must Be Given Before Rejecting Appeal for Non-Compliance with s.249(4)(b): Hyderabad Tribunal examined the legality of dismissal of an appeal by the CIT(A)/NFAC on the ground that the Assessee had not deposited “advance tax equivalent” as mandated under section 249(4)(b) where no return had been filed. AO had reopened the case u/s 147 & completed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144/144B, determining income at Rs. 62,94,561/- by making additions of cash deposits u/s 69A, estimated profit on ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031