This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Allows Full Addition After Purchases Held Bogus: 8% Estimation Rejected
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Romil Diam (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Romil Diam (ITAT Mumbai)
The Revenue filed appeals for Assessment Years 2010–11 and 2011–12 challenging the orders of the CIT(A) restricting additions on alleged bogus purchases to 8% of the total purchases, as against the Assessing Officer’s (AO) addition of 100%. The AO had treated purchases of ₹2,14,04,724 from entities such as Aadi Kalash Enterprises, Rare Demands, and Millenium Stars as entirely bogus. These entities were identified by the Investigation Wing as part of a network of accommodation entry providers associated with the Rajendra Jain Group. Inve...





