Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Union Bank of India (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Union Bank of India (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore Upholds 154 Rectification for Union Bank — Non-Rural Bad Debts Deductible u/s 36(1)(vii); Not a Debatable Issue Revenue appealed against CIT(A)’s order allowing rectification u/s 154 in favour of Assessee-Bank by treating non-grant of deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) for non-rural bad debts as a mistake apparent from record. AO had earlier rejected the rectification plea on the ground that the issue was debatable since bad debts of non-rural branches had to be adjusted against provisions made u/s 36(1)(viia). CIT(A), relying on Karnataka ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930