Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs DJ Infrastructure Dev. Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1019/D/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case:

AO made additions on account of unexplained sources of expenses on the basis of some documents found during search proceedings u/s 132 on Gopal Zarda Group. On seized documents some details of expenses and payment of share premium is mentioned. Additions made by AO were deleted by CIT (A). After examining the facts and arguments tribunal observed that CIT(A) perused the order of settlement commission and held that CIT (A) was right in deleting addition.

Facts of the case:

  • A search and seizure action u/s. 132 of the I.T. Act was carried out in the Gopal Zarda group of cases on 15.1.2009 and during the course of search at the residential premises, Director Gopal Corporation Ltd. certain documents belonging to the assessee were seized (Annexure-A 1) on which details of expenses and payment of share premium is mentioned.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031