Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Mechmen (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief of the case: In this case court observed that satisfaction was not recorded by the AO before issuing notice u/s 153C which is a fact decided by ITAT. No paper or document was seized against the assessee in the search operation. No addition or observance was made by AO in connection to any material found during search. Hon’ble court held that no action u/s 153C was justified for the above reasons. Facts of the case: Assessee is a partnership firm carrying on the business of Hi. Tech Heavy Steel Fabricators and manufacturer for last more than 25 years. A search was conducted against the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930