Many times it may happen that the taxpayer has paid excess tax as against the tax required to be paid by him. In such a case he is granted refund of the excess tax paid by him. In this part you can gain knowledge about various provisions relating to claim of refund of excess tax paid by the taxpayer.
When the tax paid by the taxpayer (could be in the form of advance tax or tax deducted/collected at source or self-assessment tax or payment of tax on regular assessment) is more than the required amount, he will be eligible to claim refund of the excess tax paid by him. Sections 237 to 245 deal with the provisions relating to refund of tax.
When does the refund arise?
As per section 237, if any person satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any year exceeds the amount of tax payable by him, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess tax paid by him.
Person entitled to claim refund
In the normal course, the person who has paid the tax is entitled to claim the refund of excess tax paid by him. There are certain special cases in which the refund is to be claimed by a person other than the payer. The provisions relating to person entitled to claim refund in certain special cases are given in section 238. As per section 238, following persons are entitled to claim refund of tax:
How to claim refund?
If the taxpayer has to make a claim of refund, then the claim should be made in Form No. 30. [In the normal course, refund is to be claimed in the return of income itself and no special form is to be submitted to claim the refund.]
The claim of refund is to be made within one year from the last day of the assessment year. Circular 9/2015 [F.NO.312/22/2015-OT], dated 9-6-2015 is issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) for dealing the matters relating to applications for condonation of delay in filing returns claiming refund and returns claiming carry forward of loss and set-off thereof. This Circular is issued in supersession of all earlier Instructions/Circulars/Guidelines issued by the CBDT relating to above discussed matter of condonation. The Circular containing comprehensive guidelines on the conditions for condonation and the procedure to be followed for deciding such matters. The details in this regard (as given in said Circular) are as follows:
1. The Principal Commissioners of Income-tax/Commissioners of Income-tax (Pr.CsIT/CsIT) shall be vested with the powers of acceptance/rejection of such applications/claims if the amount of such claims is not more than Rs.10 lakhs for any one assessment year. The Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief Commissioners of Income-tax (Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT) shall be vested with the powers of acceptance/rejection of such applications/claims if the amount of such claims exceeds Rs.10 lakhs but is not more than Rs. 50 lakhs for any one assessment year. The applications/claims for amount exceeding Rs.50 lakhs shall be considered by the CBDT.
2. No condonation application for claim of refund/loss shall be entertained beyond six years from the end of the assessment year for which such application/claim is made. This limit of six years shall be applicable to all authorities having powers to condone the delay as per the above prescribed monetary limits, including the CBDT. A condonation application should be disposed of within six months from the end of the month in which the application is received by the competent authority, as far as possible.
3. In a case where refund claim has arisen consequent to a Court order, the period for which any such proceedings were pending before any Court of Law shall be ignored while calculating the said period of six years, provided such condonation application is filed within six months from the end of the month in which the Court order was issued or the end of financial year whichever is later.
4. The powers of acceptance/rejection of the application within the monetary limits delegated to the Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT/Pr.CsIT/CsIT in case of such claims will be subject to Following conditions:
i. At the time of considering the case under Section 119(2)(b), it shall be ensured that the income/loss declared and/or refund claimed is correct and genuine and also that the case is of genuine hardship on merits.
ii. The Pr.CCIT/CCIT/Pr.CIT/CIT dealing with the case shall be empowered to direct the jurisdictional assessing officer to make necessary inquiries or scrutinize the case in accordance with the provisions of the Act to ascertain the correctness of the claim.
5. A belated application for supplementary claim of refund (claim of additional amount of refund after completion of assessment for the same year) can be admitted for condonation provided other conditions as referred above are fulfilled. The powers of acceptance/rejection within the monetary limits delegated to the Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT/Pr.CsJT/CsIT in case of returns claiming refund and supplementary claim of refund would be subject to the following further conditions:
i. The income of the assessee is not assessable in the hands of any other person under any of the provisions of the Act.
ii. No interest will be admissible on belated claim of refunds.
iii. The refund has arisen as a result of excess tax deducted/collected at source and/or excess advance tax payment and/or excess payment of self-assessment tax as per the provisions of the Act.
6. In the case of an applicant who has made investment in 8% Savings (Taxable) Bonds, 2003 issued by Government of India opting for scheme of cumulative interest on maturity but has accounted interest earned on mercantile basis and the intermediary bank at the time of maturity has deducted tax at source on the entire amount of interest paid without apportioning the accrued interest/TDS, over various financial years involved, the time limit of six years for making such refund claims will not be applicable.
7. The Circular will cover all such applications/claims for condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) which are pending as on the date of issue of the Circular.
8. The CBDT reserves the power to examine any grievance arising out of an order passed or not passed by the authorities mentioned in para 1 above and issue suitable directions to them for proper implementation of the Circular. However, no review of or appeal against the orders of such authorities would be entertained by the CBDT.
Refund on appeal
As per section 240, in a case where the refund becomes due as a result of any order passed in appeal or other proceeding under the Act, the Assessing Officer shall, except as otherwise provided in the Act, refund the amount to the taxpayer without his having to make any claim in that behalf.
However, where –
Interest on delayed refund
Many times the taxpayer does not get the refund in due time, in such a case he is granted interest on delayed refund. The provisions in this regard are given in section 244A. The provisions in this regard are as follows:
However, no interest shall be payable if the amount of refund is less than 10% of the tax as determined under section 143(1) or tax determined under regular assessment.
Interest on refund which arises out of appeal effect
Where a refund, arises as a result of giving effect to an order under section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263 or section 264, is delayed beyond the time prescribed under section 153(5)(i.e., 3 months from the end of the month in which such order is received by CIT), the assessee shall be entitled to receive an additional interest the rate of 3% per annum, for the period beginning from the date following the date of expiry of the time allowed under subsection (5) of section 153 to the date on which the refund is granted.
Interest on refund of TDS to deductor
Where refund of any amount becomes due to the deductor in respect of TDS/TCS paid to the credit of the Central Government, such deductor shall be entitled to receive, in addition to the said amount, simple interest thereon calculated at the rate of one-half per cent for every month or part of a month comprised in the period, from the date on which—
(a) claim for refund is made in the prescribed form; or
(btax is paid, where refund arises on account of giving effect to an order under section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262,
to the date on which the refund is granted.
Withholding of refund in certain cases
Where, notice under section 143(2) has been issued to assessee and Assessing Officer is of opinion that grant of refund is likely to adversely affect the revenue, he may after taking prior approval of Principal Commissioner or Commissioner withhold the refund up to the date on which the assessment is made.
(Applicable w.e.f. Assessment Year 2017-18)
No interest in certain cases
The taxpayer will not be entitled to any interest on refund, if the proceedings resulting in the refund are delayed for the reasons attributable to the taxpayer or the deductor (whether wholly or in part). In such a case, the period of the delay so attributable to him shall be excluded from the period for which interest is payable.
Where any question arises as to the period to be excluded, it shall be decided by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner whose decision thereon shall be final.
Variation in the amount of refund
Where, as a result of an order under section 143(3) or section 144 or section 147 or section 154 or section 155 or section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263 or section 264 or an order of the Settlement Commission under section 245D(4), the amount on which interest was payable has been increased or reduced (as the case may be), then the interest shall be increased or reduced accordingly.
In a case where the interest is reduced, the Assessing Officer shall serve on the taxpayer a notice of demand in the prescribed form specifying the amount of the excess interest paid and requiring him to repay such amount.
Power of tax authorities to set-off the refund
At times, it may happen that, refund may be due to the taxpayer for some assessment year(s) and there may be some tax demand remaining payable by the taxpayer. In such a case, section 245 empowers the tax authorities to set-off the refund due to the taxpayer against the amount due from him.
As per section 245, where a refund is found to be due to any person, the tax authorities authorised in this regard, may, in lieu of payment of the refund to the taxpayer, set off the amount to be refunded or any part of that amount against the sum, if any, remaining payable by the person to whom the refund is due. However, such an action can be done only after giving an intimation in writing to such person of the action proposed to be taken.