Case Law Details
Case Name : ITO Vs Prithvi Raj Kandoi (HUF) (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Prithvi Raj Kandoi (HUF) (ITAT Delhi)
AO reopened the assessment u/s 148 based on information from Investigation Wing & treated Rs.8,05,127/- (investment in Global Capital Markets Ltd.) as bogus u/s 68, further adding Rs.24,153/- u/s 69C as commission expenditure (3% of trade value). AO concluded that transactions were only accommodation entries for routing unaccounted money. CIT(A) deleted both additions.
Before Tribunal, Dept argued that these were sham penny stock transactions & CIT(A) erred in granting relief. Assessee countered that purchases were through recognized stock e...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
One Comment
Cancel reply
Sir,
thanks for sharing case law