Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subashini Sood Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subashini Sood Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Relief for Senior Citizen: ITAT Limits Cash Deposit Addition, Cites Madras HC Ruling on 115BBE Assessee filed her return declaring income of Rs.2,72,210/-. During scrutiny, AO noticed cash deposits of Rs.11,47,000/- made in December 2016 during demonetization. Not satisfied with her explanation, AO treated the sum as unexplained money u/s 69A & taxed the same u/s 115BBE @ 60%, enhancing income to Rs.14,19,210/-. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before Tribunal, it was argued that deposits came from past withdrawals made in FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14, kept a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930