Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subashini Sood Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Subashini Sood Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Relief for Senior Citizen: ITAT Limits Cash Deposit Addition, Cites Madras HC Ruling on 115BBE Assessee filed her return declaring income of Rs.2,72,210/-. During scrutiny, AO noticed cash deposits of Rs.11,47,000/- made in December 2016 during demonetization. Not satisfied with her explanation, AO treated the sum as unexplained money u/s 69A & taxed the same u/s 115BBE @ 60%, enhancing income to Rs.14,19,210/-. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before Tribunal, it was argued that deposits came from past withdrawals made in FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14, kept a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031