HC Quashes I-T Order Against P. Chidambaram & Family & Held Reopening discriminatory

Karti P. Chidambaram Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Madras High Court)

In the instant case, the petitioner’s assessment for the subject assessment year was taken up for scrutiny. All primary facts were available with the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer completed the scrutiny assessment vide order dated 30.12.2011. After the expiry of four years, the impugned notice dated 31.03.2016 was issued. The petitioner requested for the copy of the reasons for reopening vide representation dated 13.04.2016. The re

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.