Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : G. Victor Devasahayam Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Crl.R.C. Nos. 826 & 827 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/11/2021
Related Assessment Year : 1983-84 and 1984-85
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

G. Victor Devasahayam Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)

It is not disputed that sanction under Section 279 (1) of Income Tax Act is already been granted and sanctioned for the offence under Section 276(C)(1) and other offences. Since the expression unless the sanction had been already obtained for a prosecution on the same facts as those on which, the altered or added charge is found, new or fresh sanction is not required, as contemplated under Section 216(5) of Cr.P.C., is present.

As stated supra, the Assessment Year is one and the same. Initial charge is for evasion of tax. Now, by way of alteration of charge, it is included to add evasion of payment of tax and hence, I do not find any error in the order passed by the Special Sessions Judge, in allowing the application.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

The matter is heard through “Video Conference”.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031