Case Law Details
Dinesh Kumar Goyal Vs ITO (Calcutta High Court)
The case of Dinesh Kumar Goyal vs ITO brought before the Calcutta High Court revolves around the non-consideration of repeated representations made for updating challans against outstanding taxes.
Grievance Raised: The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Goyal, raised a “limited grievance” about the non-consideration and delays in updating the tax challans for the assessment years 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2009-2010, and 2013-2014. He had made several representations, which were not considered by the concerned Income Tax Officer (ITO).
Court’s Directive: Taking cognizance of the presented facts and arguments, the Calcutta High Court directed the Income Tax Officer of Ward-6(1), Kolkata, to review and resolve the pending representations. The ITO is required to act in accordance with the law and update the outstanding tax challans within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The Court further directed the ITO to inform the petitioner of any actions taken within a week from the date of taking such action.
Legal Implications: The Court’s ruling underscores the importance of timely administrative actions and reiterates the duty of tax authorities to act in accordance with the law. This decision may set a precedent for other taxpayers facing similar issues of administrative delays in the processing of their tax-related documents.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
