Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income Tax Officer Vs Paraskumar V.Kataria Prop. (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 1999-2000
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Argument on behalf of Revenue that the CIT(A) has committed error in modifying the GP rate at 03.56% as against 07.29% applied by the AO on suppressed sales. In this regard, we note that the AO issued notice under s.142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961  asking the  assessee to show-cause as to why the GP or unaccounted sales should not be estimated at par with the GP on accounted sales. The AO noted that the assessee did not furnish any record in response to such notice and merely stated that the ITAT has estimated the GP on the lower side in the subsequent assessment years. The CIT(A) has mer...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930