Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : SPL Gold India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No.1368 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

SPL Gold India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court)

We have also considered the Assessment Order. It is true that between 20/05/2021 and 25/05/202 1 there was a lockdown in Mumbai and 22/05/2021 and 23/05/2021 were holidays. Therefore, even with a superhuman effort, Petitioner would not have been able to file the huge number of documents called for in the short period granted and therefore, passing of the Assessment Order without granting sufficient time to Petitioner is certainly violative of the principles of natural justice. We are inclined to quash the Assessment Order dated 25/05/2021 which we hereby do. The matter is remanded for de novo consideration.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER of BOMBAY HIGH COURT

1. Petitioner is impugning the Assessment Order dated 25/05/2021 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) computing Petitioner’s total income at 114,57,33,424/- as against the returns of income filed by Petitioner declaring total income at Rs.Nil. This was for AY 2018-19.

2. According to Petitioner a notice under Section 142(1) dated 20/05/202 1 was received on 21/05/2021 requiring Petitioner to submit various details by 25/05/2021. 22/05/2021 was 4th Saturday and 23/05/202 1 was a Sunday. Petitioner is based in Mumbai and during those days, there was a lockdown in Mumbai due to Covid-19 pandemic. Dr. Shivaram stated that notwithstanding this situation and being aware of the problem faced by Petitioner because the Assessing Officer also is based in Mumbai, time only up to 25/05/202 1 was granted and it was an unreasonably short time. Dr. Shivaram submitted that the documents sought included details with respect to advances from customers above Rs.9 Lakhs including letter confirmation, copy of invoices, bank statement highlighting receipt of advances etc., bank books and bank account statements, item-wise stock register, month-wise stock movement summary, details of all sales and purchases of parties above Rs.5 Lakhs along with their ledgers, corresponding purchase invoices, delivery challan copy / import documents, stock register in Excel format and reconciliation with monthly purchases and sales made, details of bad debts etc. Dr. Shivaram stated that Petitioner would have required minimum one month to collect and collate the details sought and the compilation would be in excess of 1000 pages. Respondents, however, proceeded to pass the Assessment Order on 25/05/202 1 making an addition of Rs. 114.57 Crores to Petitioner’s total income.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031