Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Alok Gautam (ITAT Lucknow 'A' Bench)
Related Assessment Year :
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 14. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In our considered view, the order passed by the Id. CIT(A) cannot be sustained. The undisputed facts are that gift was given by two persons namely, Smt Badrun-nisan Hanfi and Shri Habib-bur Rehman, who were claimed to be related to Shri Sirajul Hassan Hanfi, who was stated to be composer contractor with the company M/s Gyan Securities Pvt Ltd, whose director is the assessee. He worked with the company as a contractor between 1970s and early 80s. Thereafter, Shri Sirajul Hassan Hanfi shifted to J...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031