Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Srujana Padma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Srujana Padma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Filing Rectification U/s 154 First Is Valid Reason for Delay – Bangalore ITAT Revives Appeal in Demonetisation SBN Deposit Case The Bangalore ITAT held that pursuing a rectification application u/s 154 before filing an appeal constitutes a valid and bona fide reason for delay in filing appeal before the CIT(A). Accordingly, the Tribunal condoned a 73-day delay and restored the matter back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits. The assessee’s case had been selected for limited scrutiny to examine cash deposits during the demonetisation perio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gross Profit Cannot Be Estimated Without Rejecting Books: Bangalore ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Lack of Section 151(ii) Approval: Hyderabad ITAT Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031