Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Gopal Store Vs AO (Orissa High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) No.18079 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sri Gopal Store Vs AO (Orissa High Court)

In the recent case of Sri Gopal Store vs AO, the Orissa High Court established a vital precedent for faceless assessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court ruled that the assessee should be provided a minimum of seven days to comply with a show cause notice (SCN), following guidelines from the Central Board Direct Taxes (CBDT).

Analysis: In this case, Sri Gopal Store, the petitioner, was issued a show cause notice on 12th December, 2022, requiring a response by 16th December, 2022. The petitioner argued that this did not adhere to CBDT guidelines, which mandate a minimum notice period of seven days unless the assessment period is nearing its expiry. The AO countered that the assessee had been given several opportunities and sufficient time to comply but had failed to do so. Furthermore, the AO argued that while the compliance date was 16th December, the scrutiny order was only passed on 23rd December, 2022, giving the assessee 11 days to comply.

Upon review, the Orissa High Court ruled in favour of the petitioner, noting that the revenue authority was obliged to provide a reasonable timeframe for the assessee to respond to the show cause notice. The court further observed that there was no justification for curtailing the response time.

Conclusion: The judgment in the Sri Gopal Store vs AO case by the Orissa High Court reinforces the importance of adherence to procedural guidelines in tax assessment proceedings. By ruling that a minimum of seven days must be given to comply with a show cause notice, the court underscored the need for fairness and reasonableness in tax procedures. This verdict is a significant step towards enhancing transparency and predictability in faceless assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable PCIT Central not competent authority u/s 12AB(1) to pass order on registration of Trust No Denial of Concessional Tax Rate Due to Technical Glitch on ITBA portal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031