In the present set of facts, we have noted that the AO had considered the impugned repair expenditure as annual rent in the hands of the assessee which was without any basis. As far as the assessee was concerned, the deduction @ 30% is like a standard deduction as prescribed u/s.24(a) of IT Act, not necessarily incurred towards repairs of the house property as held in the case of JB Patel & Co. 118 ITD 556. Therefore, the alleged allegation of the AO that at the same time this expenditure would have been claimed both by the owner as also by the tenant has no legal basis, thus hereby overruled. We are also not convinced with the directions of the ld.CIT(A) that the amount of expenditure would be includible in the Annual Letting Value of the property, as it was held in the case of Mukesh D.Ambani (supra). Under the totality of the circumstances of the case, we hereby reverse the factual as also legal findings of the authorities below and direct to delete the addition.
ITAT “ C ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
BEFORE SHRI MUKUL Kr. SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER And
SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
I.T.A. No.1727/Ahd/2010
Assessment Year: 2006-07)
Tushar Shantilal Kothari Vs. Dy .CIT
Date of Hearing : 23/1/2013
Date of Pronouncement: 31/1/13
O R D E R



