Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramendra Vikram Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

CASE LAWS DETAILS

DECIDED BY: ITAT, LUCKNOW BENCH `B’, LUCKNOW,

IN THE CASE OF: Ramendra Vikram Singh Vs ITO, APPEAL NO: ITA Nos. 76 to 79/Luc/08,  DECIDED ON: February 27, 2009

RELEVANT PARAGRAPH

12. We have-considered the rival submissions and peru

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. R.LGARG - ADVOCATE says:

    no doubt the assessee has to satisfy the exp incurred and withdrawl from bank to that extent or cash in hand subject to evidnce, but there is no provision in the ITR to show such expenses and it is to be verified whether permission from Muncipality is required for repairs off Boundary wall as well as general renovation. The person occupying the house is a Retd Chief Justice and can through better light on the expenses incurred in developments even ignoring hearsay. benefit of doubt can also be given to assessee if any.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31