Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs Kapil Nagpal (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief about the case:
In the case of CIT vs Kapil Nagpal, it was held by the Delhi High Court that purchase of an agricultural land used for agricultural purposes did not violate 54F conditions. Further the exclusive ownership of the residential house on the date of transfer is required to prove violation of Section 54F.
In the given case the assessee claimed exemption u/s 54F after transfer of long term shares on 08.11.2007.On the date of transfer the Assessee had one house at Village Fatehpur Beri which he had purchased on 22.07.2006 and only 15% share in the house property at Gadaipur. It w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Good decision if an assessee is co-owner in property then it will not consider as holding residential house (ie one house as on date of house) for claiming 54F exemption