Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Emco Limited Vs The Union of India and others (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 12124 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/02/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Authorities under the Act are obliged to dispose of proceedings before them as expeditiously as possible after the conclusion of the hearing. This alone would ensure that all the submissions made by a party are considered in the order passed and ensure that the litigant also has a satisfaction of noting that all his submissions have been considered and an appropriate order has been passed. It is most important that the litigant must have complete confidence in the process of litigation and that this confidence would be shaken if there is excessive delay between the conclusion of the hearing and delivery of judgment.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 12124 OF 2013

Emco Limited

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Ram S. says:

    This seems to be a fair case and why the excise people creating problems and unnecessary litigation. These kind of junk cases time wasting and mental agony to the establishments are the origin of bad working of govt. machinery.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031