This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Disallowance of purchases in cash justified when banking channels were available
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Madhav Govind Dhulshete Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Madhav Govind Dhulshete Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Section 40A is inserted in Income Tax Act with an aim and object to discourage payment of money in cash beyond a certain limit. That is to encourage cheque transactions and banking operations. Thus, in these circumstances, Assessing Officer is correct in making disallowance of Rs. 36,16,500 out of the total consideration of Rs. 39,00,960 as substantial sum has been paid in cash even though banking channels are available to both, the Assessee as well as the stockist.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT
1. By this Ap...
