Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Narain Prasad Dalmia (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The issue of revenue’s appeal is that the CIT(A) has wrongly deleted the dis allowance made by AO under Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules at Rs. 55,47,700/-. Here the assessee before the lower authorities and even before us explained that out of the total interest payment of Rs.97,22,656/-, the interest aggregating to Rs. 92,69,529/- was paid to Brila Global Finance Co. Ltd., DSP Merill Lynch Capital Ltd. and J.M. Financial Products Pvt. Ltd. is relating to loans taken for IPOs shares, which were business transaction and taken in stocks. To prove this point the assessee explained that the shares w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930