Case Law Details

Case Name : Swew Benefit Company Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkatta)
Appeal Number : ITA No 41/kol/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (4788) ITAT Kolkata (348)
Brief of the case:  ITAT Kolkatta held in Swew Benefit Company Vs DCIT that for disallowing expenses u/s 14A i.e expense incurred for non-taxable income, there had to be some logical strong basis like rule 8D or something else but it could not be disallowed on ad-hoc basis. If any authority was disallowing the expense incurred by the assessee for earning non-taxable income then that disallowance should made on proper basis not on ad-hoc basis. In other words only that part of expense had to be disallowed which had been utilized for earning that non-taxable income only. All expenses should not be disallowed on ad-hoc basis.

Facts of the case:  Assessee was in the business of giving loans on interest who in spite of earning interest income of Rs 78,09,191/- also earned income by way of dividend. Assessee claimed total expense of Rs 7,11,3013/- in his return of income which was totally disallowed by the AO on adhoc-basis. Later this figure of disallowance was changed to Rs 2 Lakh on ad-hoc basis by CIT(A) because after applying the rule 8D the amount of expense to be disallowed was coming more that the amount of total expense. As the Ld .CIT(A) had to disallow some amount of the expense so he disallowed Rs 2 Lakh.

Contention of the assessee:  Assessee was of the view that as the basis which the authorities adopted lacks genuine calculation and was without any basis so the above said expenses should be allowed. There was no provision in the IT act which allows for the disallowance of expenses on ad-hoc basis.

Contention of the revenue:  Revenue was of the view that after applying sec 14A read with rule 8D which allows for 0.5% of average investment which was coming more than the total expense of the assessee so CIT(A) disallowed Rs 2 Lakh on ad-hoc basis. Moreover the assessee was unable to provide any explanation regarding the expenses for non-taxable income so the revenue disallowed the expense Rs 2 Lakh on ad-hoc basis.

Held by ITAT:  ITAT held that the disallowance lacks basis of computation, moreover the disallowance was also not as per rule 8D so the disallowance on ad-hoc basis would not be acceptable. So the appeal of the assessee was allowed. There could not be any ad-hoc disallowance u/s 14A of the act read with rule 8D of the rules

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (26783)
Type : Judiciary (10935)
Tags : ITAT Judgments (4970) Rishabh Mehra (100) rule 8D (93) Section 14A (255)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *