This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Differences in Approved Valuer’s Opinion Not Concealment of Income: ITAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sengoda Gounder HUF Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sengoda Gounder HUF Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
In the case of Sengoda Gounder HUF versus DCIT, the appeal was against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Here’s the gist of the order by the ITAT Chennai:
Background: The case involved the sale of ancestral property by legal heirs. The assessee, Sengoda Gounder HUF, filed the income tax return for AY 2010-11, including capital gains. The Assessing Officer (AO) proposed additions based on the Registration Department’s guideline value, which was contested by the assessee. The matter went to the Tribunal, whi...
Author Info
